Formalisation Creates Models

I have been having some discussions lately about with various people around the globe on what constitutes a “model”.

Some of those with whom I have been in discussion hold the view that any concept or mental picture that a person holds in their head constitutes a model.  While this might be valid from a philosophical point of view, such models are of little or no value in the world of business analysis and modelling.

Many business people will have a mental “picture” of the business as it is now or as it should to be.  This will be a good starting point for discussion, evaluation and analysis but will be too nebulous to bring about effective business change.

The Integrated Modelling Method has a definition of what constitutes a model and what does not.  Basically a model, in whatever form (whether in words or pictures), must use standard conventions and apply rigorous standards.

Some people have argued that this is merely “formalisation”.  I would argue that anything that is NOT formalised is NOT a model.

Formalisation turns loose pictures and concepts into models.

At a philosophical level this rigour might not be called for, but in the world of business analysis and modelling informal models are, to quote a friend of mine, “about a much use as a chocolate teapot”!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
  • Share/Bookmark

About the Author

John Owens

John has over 30 years experience in very wide range of business activity in enterprises of all sizes from family businesses to multinational corporations. He is passionate about bringing quality, power, simplicity and elegance to the world of Business Analysis and Modelling.

Leave a Reply

« Back to text comment